Return to calendar
Thursday, September 10, 2026

New York City FCOpen full analysisNew England RevolutionOpen full analysis

MLS 12.60X3.5522.50
SEO Match Summary
New England Revolution defeated New York City FC 2-1 in this MLS fixture played on 2026-09-10. The shot count was 18 for New York City FC and 11 for New England Revolution. Possession finished at 65.0 percent against 35.0 percent. Expected goals were 1.18 for the home side and 2.36 for the visitors. The starting shapes were 4-2-3-1 and 4-3-3. The final score, attacking indicators, discipline, goalkeeper data and visual comparison are detailed below. The figures provide a factual account of the completed match and do not turn the recap into a prediction. The Football dashboard retains the interactive filters, team histories and season views for deeper analysis.
New York City FC N New York City FC
1 2
Full Time
New England Revolution N New England Revolution
Luighi Hanri
Daniel GazdagCarles Gil
Expected Goals (xG) 1.18 2.36
Shots 18 11
Shots on Target 6 6
Possession 65% 35%
Post-Shot xG Faced 2.68 2.30
Goals Saved Above xG +0.68 +1.30
Yellow Cards 0 2
Total Goals3
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-3-3
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

New York City FC GK
PSxG conceded2.68
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.68
Save %66.7%
New England Revolution GK
PSxG conceded2.30
Goals conceded1
Goals saved1.30
Save %83.3%
New England Revolution's keeper stopped about 1.3 goal more than an average keeper would, while New York City FC's keeper stopped about 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot