Nice and Lorient drew 0-0 in Ligue 1, with both sides using a 3-4-2-1 shape but producing contrasting routes to goal. Nice controlled 60% of possession and circulated the ball through their wing-backs and two supporting attackers, yet their territorial advantage did not translate into regular accurate attempts. Lorient were more selective in possession, defending within a compact structure before advancing quickly into the spaces around Nice’s back three. The visitors registered 1.28 xG, compared with Nice’s 1.05, showing that the clearer opportunities were not necessarily created by the side seeing more of the ball. Goalkeeping remained decisive at both ends, with each goalkeeper recording a 100% save rate to preserve the clean sheets. Nice’s greater overall shooting volume therefore carried limited weight, while Lorient’s more direct approach gave the hosts a different defensive problem despite their smaller share of possession. Romain Lissorgue oversaw a tactically balanced contest in which matching systems narrowed central space and placed added importance on execution in both penalty areas. The draw adds another balanced chapter to this head-to-head.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Nice GK
PSxG conceded0.18
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.18
Save %100.0%
Lorient GK
PSxG conceded0.23
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.23
Save %100.0%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot