Chicago Fire beat Orlando City SC 2-1 in MLS, using their compact 4-3-3 to withstand Orlando’s territorial pressure before exploiting the hosts’ more expansive 4-2-3-1 shape. Orlando held 57% possession and generated 16 shots, but Chicago’s defensive organisation and goalkeeping proved decisive. The visitors managed only seven attempts, yet placed three on target and scored twice, demonstrating greater efficiency in the decisive moments. Orlando recorded 1.77 xG compared with Chicago’s 1.30, while the contrasting goalkeeper figures further explained the outcome: Chicago’s keeper saved 80% of the five shots on target faced and finished 0.70 goals above expectation. At the other end, Orlando’s goalkeeper stopped 33.33% of Chicago’s three efforts on target and registered -0.07 goals saved above expected. Robert Lewandowski scored once for Chicago, while David Brekalo supplied Orlando’s goal, but the Fire’s other strike ultimately separated the teams. Rosendo Mendoza oversaw a contest in which Orlando carried more of the ball and shot volume, while Chicago’s structure, finishing and resistance secured the points. Chicago leave Orlando with a valuable MLS away win.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Orlando City SC GK
PSxG conceded1.93
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.07
Save %33.3%
Chicago Fire GK
PSxG conceded1.70
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.70
Save %80.0%
Chicago Fire's keeper stopped about 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would, while Orlando City SC's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot