Inter Miami CF's 4–2 victory over Orlando City SC on 2 March demonstrated the visitors' superior efficiency in a one-sided MLS encounter. Miami's 4–2-3-1 formation dominated Orlando's 3–4-2-1 setup, generating 15 shots to the hosts' 10 and converting chances with clinical precision. The expected goals metric starkly illustrated the disparity: Inter Miami accumulated 1.82 xG whilst Orlando managed just 0.81, reflecting Miami's control throughout. Lionel Messi led the away side with two goals, supported by Mateo Silvetti and Telasco Segovia, whilst Orlando's response through Martin Ojeda and Marco Pasalic proved insufficient. Orlando's goalkeeper struggled with a 60 per cent save percentage and conceded 1.31 post-shot expected goals, indicating poor positioning or quality of shots faced. Miami's eight shots on target versus Orlando's five underscored the clinical finishing that separated the sides. Inter Miami's superior attacking output and conversion rate proved decisive in what was a comprehensive away performance. Miami's attacking potency continues to set them apart in the league.
OOrlando City SC
2–4
Full Time
IInter Miami CF
M. Pašalić18'M. Ojeda24'G. Dorsey24'I. Angulo18'
L. Messi57', 90'T. Segovia85'M. Silvetti49'T. Segovia49', 57'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Orlando City SC GK
PSxG conceded2.09
Goals conceded4
Goals saved-1.91
Save %50.0%
Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded1.31
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.69
Save %60.0%
Inter Miami CF's keeper let in roughly 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would, while Orlando City SC's keeper let in roughly 1.9 goals more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot