Palermo beat Lecce 2-0 in the Coppa Italia, executing their 4-2-3-1 with greater efficiency despite spending less time on the ball. Lecce held 55% possession and produced 18 shots, compared with Palermo’s 12, but the hosts defended their penalty area effectively and made better use of their opportunities. Palermo generated 1.46 xG and placed five attempts on target, with Joel Pohjanpalo scoring once to provide the focal point their attack required. Lecce’s 1.61 xG was marginally higher, yet none of their four shots on target beat a Palermo goalkeeper who recorded a 100% save rate. At the other end, Lecce’s goalkeeper stopped 60% of the five efforts he faced, underlining the difference in finishing and resistance between the sides. Both teams used the same nominal formation, but Palermo’s compact shape without possession and sharper work in decisive areas outweighed Lecce’s greater volume of attacks. Alberto Ruben Arena oversaw a contest defined less by territorial control than Palermo’s discipline in both boxes. Palermo progress with a tactically assured victory over top-flight opposition.
PPalermo
2–0
Full Time
LLecce
D. Vavassori14'J. Pohjanpalo42'P. Peda14'D. Johnsen42'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Palermo GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
Save %100.0%
Lecce GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Save %60.0%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot