Cremonese beat Parma 2-0 in the Coppa Italia, using their 4-2-3-1 to establish a narrow territorial edge and produce the clearer volume of attempts. The visitors had 51% possession to Parma’s 49%, but their advantage was more apparent in the final third: Cremonese registered 13 shots and six on target, compared with nine attempts and two on target for the home side. Parma’s goalkeeper faced six shots on target and recorded a 66.67% save percentage, while Cremonese’s keeper stopped both efforts he faced for a perfect 100% rate. With no xG figures or scorer data available, the shot profile provides the strongest measure of the contest, and it points to Cremonese’s greater control of the decisive moments despite an even share of the ball. Parma’s 4-3-3 could not turn its possession into sustained threat against an organised opposing shape. Cremonese progress in the Coppa Italia.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Parma GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Save %66.7%
Cremonese GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
Save %100.0%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot
