Philadelphia Union drew 2-2 with Inter Miami CF in MLS, with the hosts’ 4-4-2 producing greater shot volume while Miami’s 4-3-3 relied on more selective attacking. Philadelphia recorded 17 attempts and six on target, compared with Miami’s five shots and three on target, yet the visitors secured a point through greater efficiency. Neil Pierre and Indiana Vassilev scored for the Union, while Lionel Messi supplied one of Miami’s two goals. The underlying figures favoured Philadelphia, whose chances amounted to 2.59 xG against Miami’s 1.48, despite the Union holding only 43% possession. That contrast suggested Philadelphia were comfortable attacking with less of the ball, using their two-forward structure to generate opportunities rather than seeking prolonged control. Miami had 57% possession but faced sustained pressure, with their goalkeeper saving 66.67% of the shots on target encountered and performing 0.42 goals better than the post-shot expectation. At the other end, Philadelphia’s goalkeeper saved 33.33%, underlining how Miami turned limited openings into decisive moments. The draw keeps this MLS head-to-head finely balanced.
PPhiladelphia Union
2–2
Draw
IInter Miami CF
N. Pierre58'I. Vassilev11'F. Westfield11'M. Iloski58'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Philadelphia Union GK
PSxG conceded1.56
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.44
Save %33.3%
Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded2.42
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.42
Save %66.7%
Inter Miami CF's keeper stopped about 0.4 goal more than an average keeper would, while Philadelphia Union's keeper let in roughly 0.4 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot