Return to calendar
Tuesday, August 25, 2026

Plymouth ArgyleOpen full analysisCoventry CityOpen full analysis

EFL Cup 15.84X4.3821.50
SEO Match Summary
Coventry City beat Plymouth Argyle 4-2 in the EFL Cup, using their greater share of possession to control the match despite both sides starting in a 4-2-3-1 formation. Coventry had 66% possession and attempted 12 shots, compared with Plymouth’s 11, while each team registered five efforts on target. Jack Rudoni and Taiwo Awoniyi were among Coventry’s goalscorers, providing the decisive attacking output in a game where the visitors were notably more efficient with their opportunities. That contrast was also reflected in the goalkeeping figures: Coventry’s goalkeeper recorded a 60% save rate from five shots on target faced, whereas Plymouth’s goalkeeper saved 20% from the same number. Plymouth still scored twice despite operating with 34% possession, but Coventry’s territorial control and sharper finishing allowed them to establish the margin required to progress. The matching formations placed particular importance on midfield control and execution in the final third, areas in which Coventry’s numerical advantage in possession translated into a stronger overall result. Coventry advance with an encouraging early-season cup performance.
Plymouth Argyle P Plymouth Argyle
2 4
Full Time
Coventry City C Coventry City
Jack RudoniTaiwo Awoniyi
Shots 11 12
Shots on Target 5 5
Possession 34% 66%
Yellow Cards 1 2
Total Goals6
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-2-3-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Plymouth Argyle GK
PSxG conceded
Goals conceded4
Save %20.0%
Coventry City GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Save %60.0%
Plymouth Argyle's keeper kept out 20% of the shots on target, while Coventry City's keeper performed right in line with expectations.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot