Russia and Peru drew 1-1 in an International Friendly on 12 November, with the hosts dominating possession and chances but unable to break through Peru's defensive setup. Russia controlled the match from a 4-3-3 formation, registering nine shots and four on target, generating 1.31 expected goals, yet their goalkeeper made saves at a 75 per cent rate, indicating Peru's clinical finishing despite limited opportunities. The visitors, operating from a compact 5-4-1 shape, managed just three shots with two on target and a meagre 0.17 xG, suggesting their equaliser came against the run of play. Russia's attacking dominance failed to translate into victory, with Peru's defensive structure proving resilient throughout. The draw leaves both sides searching for more convincing performances in future fixtures.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Russia GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-1.00
Save %50.0%
Peru GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %75.0%
Peru's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Russia's keeper let in roughly 1.0 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot
