SEO Match Summary
Hamburger SV beat SC Verl 3-0 in the DFB-Pokal, their 3-4-3 proving more efficient than the hosts’ possession-oriented 4-2-3-1. Verl had 57% of the ball and attempted 13 shots to Hamburg’s 10, but the visitors carried the greater threat in decisive areas and registered six efforts on target, compared with four from the home side. The underlying numbers suggested a much closer contest than the final score: Hamburg produced 1.45 xG, only narrowly above Verl’s 1.33, yet their sharper finishing created a comfortable margin. Albert Gronbaek supplied two of Hamburg’s three goals, giving their attack the cutting edge needed to exploit transitions and punish Verl despite having just 43% possession. Goalkeeping also helped preserve the gap, with Hamburg’s goalkeeper saving all four shots on target for a 100% save rate, while Verl’s goalkeeper stopped 50% of the six efforts faced. Lars Erbst oversaw a tie in which Hamburg’s compact structure and superior execution mattered more than territorial control. Hamburg advance with their early-season momentum strengthened.
S
SC Verl
H
Hamburger SV
Expected Goals (xG)
1.31
1.47
Shots
13
10
Shots on Target
4
6
Possession
57%
43%
Yellow Cards
1
1
Total Goals3
Formation4-2-3-1vs3-4-3
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
SC Verl GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded3
Save %50.0%
Hamburger SV GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
Save %100.0%
SC Verl's keeper kept out 50% of the shots on target, while Hamburger SV's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot