Brazil's 3–0 victory over Scotland in FIFA World Cup Group C demonstrated the gulf between the sides' attacking efficiency and defensive solidity. The visitors dominated possession with 54 per cent and created substantially more danger, registering 21 shots to Scotland's 14, with 9 on target compared to the hosts' 5. Brazil's expected goals of 4.33 vastly outweighed Scotland's 1.04, reflecting their control throughout. The Scots' goalkeeper faced nine shots on target but managed only a 66.67 per cent save rate, conceding 4.8 post-shot expected goals, whilst Brazil's keeper was virtually untroubled, saving all five shots faced and registering a perfect 100 per cent save percentage. Scotland's 4–2–3–1 shape offered little resistance to Brazil's 4–3–3 formation, which created clear opportunities through the middle and flanks. The three-goal margin proved decisive in a match where tactical superiority translated into clinical finishing. Brazil move top of Group C with maximum points.
SScotland
0–3
Full Time
BBrazil
M. Cunha60'Vinícius Jr.7', 45+3'B. Guimarães45+3', 60'Rayan7'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Scotland GK
PSxG conceded4.80
Goals conceded3
Goals saved1.80
Save %66.7%
Brazil GK
PSxG conceded1.23
Goals conceded0
Goals saved1.23
Save %100.0%
Scotland's keeper stopped about 1.8 goals more than an average keeper would, while Brazil's keeper stopped about 1.2 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot