Sporting Kansas City's 1-2 defeat to New York Red Bulls on 24 May saw the hosts dominate possession and shot creation but fall short in clinical finishing. Kansas City generated 15 shots and 2.17 expected goals, yet managed only eight efforts on target and a single goal through Calvin Harris. The Red Bulls, operating in a 4-3-3 formation, proved far more efficient despite registering just 10 shots and 1.1 xG, with Jorge Ruvalcaba scoring twice to secure the away victory. New York's goalkeeper struggled with a 50 per cent save percentage and -0.44 goals saved above expected goals, suggesting Kansas City's profligacy rather than Red Bulls' dominance defined the match. Referee Nabil Bensalah oversaw a contest where the hosts' 4-4-2 setup generated volume but lacked precision in the final third, whilst the visitors capitalised on limited opportunities. Kansas City's attacking output belied their inability to convert chances into results.
SSporting Kansas City
1–2
Full Time
NNew York Red Bulls
C. Harris64'M. García64'
J. Ruvalcaba3', 45+3'G. Berggren3'J. Hall45+3'
Starting Line-ups
Sporting Kansas City · 4-4-2New York Red Bulls · 4-3-3
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Sporting Kansas City GK
PSxG conceded1.56
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.44
Save %50.0%
New York Red Bulls GK
PSxG conceded1.85
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.85
Save %87.5%
New York Red Bulls's keeper stopped about 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would, while Sporting Kansas City's keeper let in roughly 0.4 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot