Return to calendar
Thursday, April 16, 2026

St.Louis CityOpen full analysisFC TulsaOpen full analysis

US Open Cup
SEO Match Summary
St. Louis City dominated FC Tulsa 4–0 in the US Open Cup, controlling proceedings with 64 per cent possession and 22 shots to their opponents' 12. The hosts' 3–4–2–1 shape proved effective in dictating the tempo, with an expected goals tally of 3.16 reflecting their attacking dominance. Marcel Hartel opened the scoring, though the remaining three goals came without individual attribution in the data. Tulsa offered minimal threat, mustering no shots on target across the 90 minutes and managing just 36 per cent possession. St. Louis City's efficiency in front of goal—11 shots on target from 22 attempts—underlined their superiority against an outmatched opponent. The comprehensive victory demonstrates St. Louis City's credentials in cup competition.
St.Louis City S St.Louis City
4 0
Full Time
FC Tulsa F FC Tulsa
Marcel Hartel
Expected Goals (xG) 3.00 0.00
Shots 22 12
Shots on Target 11 0
Possession 64% 36%
Yellow Cards 1 4
Red Cards 0 1
Total Goals4
Formation3-4-2-1vs3-4-2-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

St.Louis City GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
FC Tulsa GK
PSxG conceded
Goals conceded4
Save %63.6%
St.Louis City's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while FC Tulsa's keeper kept out 64% of the shots on target.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot