St Louis City beat Houston Dynamo 2-1 in MLS, with their 3-4-3 proving more efficient than Houston’s 4-2-3-1 despite sustained pressure from the visitors. Houston attempted 18 shots to St Louis’s nine, but both sides placed four efforts on target, underlining how the hosts restricted the quality of the Dynamo’s openings while making better use of their own. The underlying numbers were closely matched, with St Louis recording 1.20 xG against Houston’s 1.16, so the decisive difference came in execution and goalkeeping rather than a major creative advantage. Simon Becher scored one of the home side’s goals, providing a focal point for a front three supported by wide midfielders in the 3-4-3. St Louis also benefited from a 75% goalkeeper save rate, while Houston’s was 50%, a contrast that helped protect the hosts’ narrow advantage. Houston’s greater shot volume and slight territorial edge did not translate into superior accuracy, whereas St Louis balanced compact defending with enough attacking threat to secure the points under referee Alexis Da Silva. The result gives St Louis City a valuable MLS win.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
St.Louis City GK
PSxG conceded1.54
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.54
Save %75.0%
Houston Dynamo GK
PSxG conceded1.51
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.49
Save %50.0%
St.Louis City's keeper stopped about 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would, while Houston Dynamo's keeper let in roughly 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot