St. Louis City defeated Los Angeles FC 2–1 in an MLS encounter that exemplified the hosts' clinical efficiency against a more dominant visitors. Deployed in a 3–4–3 formation, City capitalised on limited opportunities, converting two of eight shots while generating 1.72 xG through Tomas Totland and Rafael Santos. LAFC dominated possession and created substantially more chances, registering 16 shots with four on target and 1.68 xG, yet their profligacy proved costly. The visitors' goalkeeper recorded a 75 per cent save percentage, making a save 0.13 xG above expected, but David Martinez Morales's lone goal proved insufficient. City's defensive structure in their asymmetrical shape effectively nullified LAFC's width-based approach, forcing the Californians into low-conversion attempts despite their territorial superiority. The result underscores St. Louis's improving ruthlessness in transition play. City's back-to-back victories suggest mounting momentum in the Western Conference standings.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
St.Louis City GK
PSxG conceded1.13
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.13
Save %75.0%
Los Angeles FC GK
PSxG conceded1.20
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.80
Save %0.0%
St.Louis City's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Los Angeles FC's keeper let in roughly 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot