Sunderland beat Stade Rennais 2-1 in the Club Friendly Games, with the contest decided by greater efficiency in the underlying chances rather than territorial control. Both teams finished with 50.0% possession, but Sunderland produced 1.64 expected goals to Rennes’ 0.80, giving the home side a clear edge in chance quality despite an even share of the ball. Sunderland’s 4-2-3-1 provided the framework for that advantage, while Rennes operated in a 4-1-4-1 and remained within reach on the scoreboard without matching the hosts’ xG return. The goalkeeping data also aligned with the final margin: Sunderland’s goalkeeper conceded once from 1.00 post-shot expected goals against, while Rennes’ goalkeeper conceded twice from 2.00 PSxG. Neither goalkeeper registered goals saved above expected, so the result broadly reflected the quality of efforts faced. No individual scorers were supplied, and no shot totals were recorded in the data. Sunderland take a useful pre-season result into their next fixture.
SSunderland
2–1
Full Time
SStade Rennais
Expected Goals (xG)1.620.86
Possession50%50%
Yellow Cards01
Total Goals3
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-1-4-1
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Sunderland GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Stade Rennais GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot