Monza beat Torino 1-0 in the Coppa Italia, using a 3-4-2-1 shape to generate the clearer threat despite having 46.0% possession. Torino, arranged in a 5-3-2, controlled 54.0% of the ball and attempted 16 shots, but none were on target. Monza recorded 19 attempts and eight on target, repeatedly testing Torino’s goalkeeper and forcing a demanding defensive performance. Torino’s keeper posted an 87.5% save percentage from eight shots faced, but Monza’s pressure still produced the decisive goal. The contrast lay in shot quality of execution rather than territorial control: Torino had more possession but could not turn it into a single effort on target, while Monza were more direct and accurate around the penalty area. Monza progress in the Coppa Italia; Torino exit the competition.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Torino GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %87.5%
Monza GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot
