Inter Miami CF's clinical finishing proved decisive in a 4–2 victory over Toronto FC on 9 May, with the visitors' superior conversion rate ultimately determining the outcome. Operating in a 4–3–3 formation, Inter Miami dominated the expected goals battle with 1.77 xG compared to Toronto's 0.81, converting their chances with ruthless efficiency across four different goalscorers: Lionel Messi, Luis Suarez, Rodrigo de Paul, and an own goal. Toronto's 4–2–3–1 setup created genuine opportunities, registering five shots on target from 13 attempts, yet their goalkeeper's 60 per cent save percentage and 0.25 goals saved above expected proved insufficient to stem the tide. Inter Miami's seven shots on target from 11 total attempts reflected their clinical approach, with De Paul and Suarez each finding the net alongside Messi's contribution. Emilio Aristizabal's brace provided some consolation for the hosts, but Toronto's defensive vulnerabilities—conceding 2.25 post-shot expected goals—exposed deeper structural issues. The result underscores Inter Miami's attacking potency this season.
TToronto FC
2–4
Full Time
IInter Miami CF
E. Aristizábal82', 90'K. Franklin90'D. Sallói82'
R. De Paul44'L. Messi75'L. Suárez56'S. Reguilón73'R. De Paul75'L. Messi56', 73'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Toronto FC GK
PSxG conceded3.35
Goals conceded4
Goals saved-0.65
Save %42.9%
Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded2.25
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.25
Save %60.0%
Inter Miami CF's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Toronto FC's keeper let in roughly 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot