Return to calendar
Thursday, September 10, 2026

Toronto FCOpen full analysisNashville SCOpen full analysis

MLS 13.53X3.6521.98
SEO Match Summary
Toronto FC defeated Nashville SC 2-1 in this MLS fixture played on 2026-09-10. The shot count was 16 for Toronto FC and 11 for Nashville SC. Possession finished at 42.0 percent against 58.0 percent. Expected goals were 1.76 for the home side and 0.89 for the visitors. The starting shapes were 4-4-2 and 4-2-3-1. The final score, attacking indicators, discipline, goalkeeper data and visual comparison are detailed below. The figures provide a factual account of the completed match and do not turn the recap into a prediction. The Football dashboard retains the interactive filters, team histories and season views for deeper analysis.
Toronto FC T Toronto FC
2 1
Full Time
Nashville SC N Nashville SC
Niklas DorschDaniel SalloiEmilio Aristizabal
Expected Goals (xG) 1.76 0.89
Shots 16 11
Shots on Target 7 5
Possession 42% 58%
Post-Shot xG Faced 0.37 2.13
Yellow Cards 1 0
Total Goals3
Formation4-4-2vs4-2-3-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Toronto FC GK
PSxG conceded0.37
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.63
Save %80.0%
Nashville SC GK
PSxG conceded2.13
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.13
Save %71.4%
Nashville SC's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Toronto FC's keeper let in roughly 0.6 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot