Return to calendar
Saturday, May 2, 2026

Toronto FCOpen full analysisSan Jose EarthquakesOpen full analysis

MLS 13.74X3.8121.85
SEO Match Summary
Toronto FC and San Jose Earthquakes drew 1–1 in an MLS encounter that reflected both sides' inability to convert their chances into a decisive advantage. Playing in matching 4–2–3–1 formations, the Earthquakes dominated the underlying metrics with an expected goals figure of 1.09 compared to Toronto's 0.83, whilst also registering four shots on target to their hosts' two. Toronto's goalkeeper struggled with a 50 per cent save percentage and conceded 0.14 post-shot expected goals, suggesting vulnerable positioning on San Jose's efforts. Daniel Salloi opened the scoring for Toronto, only for Preston Judd to equalise for the visitors, leaving both teams with a point apiece. Despite controlling the shot count with 11 attempts, Toronto's clinical finishing proved wanting; San Jose's superior efficiency in front of goal nearly yielded all three points. The draw leaves both sides searching for consistency in their respective campaigns.
Toronto FC T Toronto FC
1 1
Draw
San Jose Earthquakes S San Jose Earthquakes
D. Sallói2' J. Osorio2'
P. Judd13' N. Tsakiris13'
Starting Line-ups
Toronto FC · 4-2-3-1 San Jose Earthquakes · 4-2-3-1
Tap a player for name & stats ·  goal   assist
Expected Goals (xG) 0.83 1.09
Shots 11 10
Shots on Target 2 4
Possession 48% 52%
Post-Shot xG Faced 1.07 0.14
Yellow Cards 2 2
Corners 8 9
Total Goals2
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-2-3-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Toronto FC GK
PSxG conceded1.07
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.07
Save %75.0%
San Jose Earthquakes GK
PSxG conceded0.14
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.86
Save %50.0%
Toronto FC's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while San Jose Earthquakes's keeper let in roughly 0.9 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot