Troyes drew 0-0 with Paris FC in Ligue 1, as the hosts’ compact 4-3-3 contained a possession-led 4-2-3-1 without offering sustained attacking threat of their own. Paris FC controlled 58% of the ball and recorded 10 shots, compared with Troyes’ nine, but the visitors managed only one effort on target. Their 1.80 xG nevertheless pointed to the better overall chances, while Troyes generated 0.42 xG and tested the opposing goalkeeper twice. Both goalkeepers finished with 100% save rates, although the low volume of shots on target—three across the match—kept their direct involvement limited. Troyes’ three-man midfield and wider defensive shape helped restrict clear openings despite conceding territory, while Paris FC’s double pivot provided control but could not translate that platform into a decisive goal. At the other end, the visitors’ back line handled Troyes’ transitions and protected a second clean sheet on the day. With no goalscorers to separate the teams, the tactical contrast between Paris FC’s territorial command and Troyes’ disciplined resistance defined the contest. The stalemate adds one point to each side’s Ligue 1 tally.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Troyes GK
PSxG conceded0.18
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.18
Save %100.0%
Paris FC GK
PSxG conceded0.47
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.47
Save %100.0%
Paris FC's keeper stopped about 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would, while Troyes's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot