Udinese drew 1-1 with Como in Serie A, with the hosts’ direct approach proving an effective counterweight to Como’s greater control of possession. Operating in a 3-4-2-1, Udinese had 41% of the ball but generated 2.14 xG from 17 shots, suggesting they found valuable openings despite spending less time in possession. Como’s 4-2-3-1 produced 20 attempts and six efforts on target, compared with Udinese’s three, while their 59% share allowed them to sustain pressure and dictate longer passages. Hassane Kamara scored Udinese’s goal, with Anastasios Douvikas replying for Como. The goalkeeping figures helped shape the stalemate: Udinese’s goalkeeper saved 83.33% of the six shots on target faced and recorded 1.19 goals prevented above expectation, an important contribution given Como’s attacking volume. At the opposite end, Como’s goalkeeper posted a 66.67% save rate from three efforts on target, with 0.02 goals saved above expectation. Alberto Ruben Arena oversaw a balanced result in which Udinese produced the higher xG but Como carried the greater shooting threat. Both sides begin their league campaigns with a point.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Udinese GK
PSxG conceded2.19
Goals conceded1
Goals saved1.19
Save %83.3%
Como GK
PSxG conceded1.02
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.02
Save %66.7%
Udinese's keeper stopped about 1.2 goal more than an average keeper would, while Como's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot