Houston Dynamo beat Vancouver Whitecaps 1-0 in MLS, prevailing through compact defending and greater efficiency despite both sides using a 4-2-3-1 formation. Vancouver controlled 64% possession and attempted 17 shots, but only one reached the target, highlighting how Houston restricted clear openings even as the hosts accumulated 1.32 xG. The visitors took a more direct route, producing five shots on target from nine attempts while operating with 36% of the ball. Houston’s 0.55 xG underlined the clinical nature of the decisive moment, although no goalscorer was listed in the supplied data. The goalkeepers’ figures reinforced the contrast: Houston’s keeper saved the only effort faced for a 100% save rate, while Vancouver’s goalkeeper stopped four of five shots on target and recorded an 80% save percentage. Vancouver’s territorial control therefore brought volume without sufficient accuracy, whereas Houston’s disciplined shape allowed them to absorb pressure and pose the sharper threat when possession changed hands. Houston strengthen their form; Vancouver must improve their attacking precision.
VVancouver Whitecaps
0–1
Full Time
HHouston Dynamo
F. Negri34'
Starting Line-ups
Vancouver Whitecaps · 4-2-3-1Houston Dynamo · 4-2-3-1
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Vancouver Whitecaps GK
PSxG conceded0.61
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.39
Save %80.0%
Houston Dynamo GK
PSxG conceded0.03
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.03
Save %100.0%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot