Ruslan Malinovskyi
Player season overview


Profile data: SofaScore
Ruslan Malinovskyi
His historical profile. Next-match context appears when the fixture is known.
History: rolling 12 months for club, country and their patterns. Match analyses stop before the studied fixture; current streaks follow the latest available completed games.
→ 35 appearances studied
→ 2 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
At least one goal
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ukraine
Hungary
Ruslan Malinovskyi’s tendencies
Leading pattern · Does not score 2/3 · At home Personal observation
1 active observation pointing the other way. Compare their samples below.
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Scores
At home
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 17 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 11 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 22 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
View 1 games+
2–<3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 8 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
Conditions not met
≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 4 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
In the previous game: ≥1 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 9 of the 20 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
→ 35 appearances studied
→ 2 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
At least one assist
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ukraine
Hungary
Ruslan Malinovskyi’s tendencies
Leading pattern · No assist 2/3 · At home Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Assists
At home
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 20 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<0.2 xA
View 3 games+
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
2–<3 team win odds
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 0 of the 2 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
View 1 games+
Conditions not met
≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 1 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
In the previous game: ≥1 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 10 of the 20 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
→ 35 appearances studied
→ 2 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
A goal or an assist
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ukraine
Hungary
Ruslan Malinovskyi’s tendencies
Leading pattern · Neither goal nor assist 2/3 · At home Personal observation
1 active observation pointing the other way. Compare their samples below.
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Goal / assist
At home
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 19 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<0.2 xA
View 3 games+
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 11 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 25 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
View 1 games+
2–<3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 7 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
Conditions not met
≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 3 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
In the previous game: ≥1 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 10 of the 20 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
→ 35 appearances studied
→ 2 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
At least 2 shots
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ukraine
Hungary
Ruslan Malinovskyi’s tendencies
Recent form · Last 5 games
- ●2+ shotsUkraine
- ●2+ shotsUkraine
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsUkraine
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsUkraine
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsGenoa
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsGenoa
- ●2+ shotsGenoa
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsTrabzonspor
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsTrabzonspor
Leading pattern · Fewer than 2 shots 2/3 · At home Personal observation
1 active observation pointing the other way. Compare their samples below.
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Shots
At home
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 19 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 6 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 25 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
View 1 games+
2–<3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 7 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
Conditions not met
≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 2 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
In the previous game: ≥1 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 7 of the 20 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
→ 35 appearances studied
→ 2 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
At least 1 shot on target
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ukraine
Hungary
Ruslan Malinovskyi’s tendencies
Recent form · Last 5 games
- ●Shot on targetUkraine
- ●Shot on targetUkraine
- ○No shot on targetUkraine
- ○No shot on targetUkraine
- ○No shot on targetGenoa
- ○No shot on targetGenoa
- ○No shot on targetGenoa
- ○No shot on targetTrabzonspor
- ○No shot on targetTrabzonspor
Leading pattern · No shot on target 2/3 · At home Personal observation
1 active observation pointing the other way. Compare their samples below.
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · On target
At home
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 16 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 9 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 22 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
View 1 games+
2–<3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
Conditions not met
≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 3 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
In the previous game: ≥1 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 9 of the 20 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
His rhythm, match by match ·
Ukraine
Latest 4 appearances within 12 months (up to 25), oldest to latest. Goal colours match the histogram.