CF Montreal drew 2–2 with New England Revolution in an MLS encounter where the visitors dominated possession and created far greater attacking threat, yet failed to convert their superiority into victory. The Revolution controlled 54 per cent of the ball and generated 4.03 xG from 21 shots, with only five on target; Carles Gil and Dor Turgeman found the net for the away side. Montreal, operating in a 4–3–3 shape, managed just 0.86 xG from 15 shots but capitalised on their limited chances through Brayan Vera and Prince Owusu's goals. The home side's goalkeeper made five saves at 60 per cent efficiency, whilst New England's stopper faced eight shots on target and saved 75 per cent, though underperformed his xG model by 0.66 goals. This result leaves both teams with points on the board despite a significant underlying performance gap that favoured the Revolution's attacking play.
CCF Montreal
2–2
Draw
NNew England Revolution
B. Vera52'P. Owusu59'E. Morales52'L. Petrasso59'
C. Gil30'D. Turgeman36'P. Miller36'
Starting Line-ups
CF Montreal · 4-3-3New England Revolution · 4-2-3-1
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
CF Montreal GK
PSxG conceded2.91
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.91
Save %60.0%
New England Revolution GK
PSxG conceded1.34
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.66
Save %75.0%
CF Montreal's keeper stopped about 0.9 goal more than an average keeper would, while New England Revolution's keeper let in roughly 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot