Return to calendar
Saturday, August 8, 2026

FC CincinnatiOpen full analysisPumas UNAMOpen full analysis

Leagues Cup, Group Stage 11.88X4.1123.27
SEO Match Summary
FC Cincinnati defeated Pumas UNAM 2–0 in a Leagues Cup group-stage encounter where the hosts made their superior efficiency count despite an even contest. Both sides shared possession at 50 per cent and registered 15 shots apiece, yet Cincinnati's clinical finishing proved decisive; Kenji Mboma Dem and Pavel Bucha each netted once, while Cincinnati's expected goals of 1.78 edged Pumas' 1.21. The Mexican visitors, deployed in a defensive 5–4–1 shape, created clear openings but squandered them, with their goalkeeper facing four shots on target but saving only one, conceding 2.0 expected goals above actual performance. Cincinnati's goalkeeper, meanwhile, recorded a perfect 100 per cent save rate across four shots faced, underpinning a clean sheet that underscored the home side's clinical control. Oliver Vergara oversaw the contest without incident. Cincinnati's victory positions them strongly in group play.
FC Cincinnati F FC Cincinnati
2 – 0
Full Time
Pumas UNAM P Pumas UNAM
Pavel BuchaKenji Mboma Dem
Shots 15 15
Shots on Target 4 4
Possession 50% 50%
Yellow Cards 1 0
Total Goals2
Formation3-4-2-1vs5-4-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

FC Cincinnati GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
Save %100.0%
Pumas UNAM GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Save %50.0%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot