FC Cincinnati dominated San Jose Earthquakes 4–2 in an MLS encounter that reflected the home side's superior control and efficiency. Playing in a 3-4-1-2 shape, Cincinnati controlled 60 per cent possession and created a clear attacking advantage, registering 23 shots with 11 on target and an xG of 2.67. San Jose, operating in a 4-3-3, managed only 12 shots and 2 on target, generating 1.42 xG, and their goalkeeper faced a relentless barrage, stopping 7 of 11 shots on target for a 63.64 save percentage. Tom Barlow, Evander and Bryan Ramirez scored for Cincinnati, while Daniel Munie and Timo Werner replied for the Earthquakes. Cincinnati's defensive structure proved robust despite conceding 2.83 xG, though goalkeeper performance metrics suggest marginal luck on both sides. The scoreline underscored Cincinnati's dominance in the final third, where their volume of chances translated into goals. Victory consolidates Cincinnati's playoff credentials as the season progresses.
FFC Cincinnati
4–2
Full Time
SSan Jose Earthquakes
B. Ramírez33'Evander82'T. Barlow79'A. Jabbari90+5'O. Nwobodo82'Evander33', 79'T. Barlow90+5'
D. Munie26'T. Werner56'P. Judd56'T. Werner26'
Starting Line-ups
FC Cincinnati · 3-4-1-2San Jose Earthquakes · 4-3-3
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
FC Cincinnati GK
PSxG conceded1.32
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.68
Save %0.0%
San Jose Earthquakes GK
PSxG conceded2.83
Goals conceded4
Goals saved-1.17
Save %63.6%
FC Cincinnati's keeper let in roughly 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would, while San Jose Earthquakes's keeper let in roughly 1.2 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot